(10 min video) The Israel-Palestine conflict: a brief, simple history – The conflict is really only 100 years old

This doesn’t mention the terrorism the non-Semitic ‘Jews’ used to take over Palestine in the first place, and how immoral and illegal the 6-day war was, but otherwise pretty good — lots of illustrations and only 10 minutes.

– –

The Israel-Palestine conflict: a brief, simple history

(audio) Texe Marrs: Charted History According to the Protocols of Zion—The Plan of Masons and Jews – 1/20/17

Lots of wisdom here.

Save Time! Listen at 1.25X or 1.5X speed: HOW TO CHANGE THE PLAYBACK SPEED OF A YOUTUBE VIDEO (tutorial)

– –

Charted History According to the Protocols of Zion—The Plan of Masons and Jews

(audio) James Perloff: Donald Trump 21st Century Super-Zionist?? — “The majority of Jews in America were against Trump, but I think the inner party members knew that he was on their team” • “He has stated he is going to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. This is very important to the Zionists, because they’ve had a long term plan in the Rothschild envisioning of greater Israel to rebuild Solomon’s temple • A big lie that the mosque at the temple mount is built directly over the remains of Solomon’s temple – to convince Christians that if the Israelis destroy that mosque it’s somehow justified biblically • 2 Thessalonians warns that the Antichrist is going to rule from a rebuilt temple, proclaiming himself to be God. This is Satanic • You have to wonder if Kushner and Trump aren’t a part of this plan to rebuild the temple, part of this Luciferian plan, perhaps using their expertise and background in building things

This is James’ current working theory.

– –

James Perloff 14:25-17:25, transcribed by Jeff Fenske:

“I know that the majority of Jews in America were against Trump, but I think that the inner party members knew that he was on their team.

He has stated that he is going to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. This is very important to the Zionists, because they’ve had a long term plan in the Rothschild envisioning of greater Israel to rebuild Solomon’s temple. There is a big lie that the mosque at the temple mount is built directly over the remains of Solomon’s ancient temple. That is a lie planted by a very high ranking Freemason named Asher Kaufman. … It’s been done to convince American Christians that if the Israelis go in … and try to destroy that mosque, which would set the Muslim world on fire, that it’s somehow justified biblically. Trump’s intention to move the embassy to Jerusalem is a move towards that.

Not only is this part of the Rothschild vision, but the Bible in 2 Thessalonians warns that the Antichrist, the man of lawlessness is going to rule from a rebuilt temple, proclaiming himself to be God. … This is Satanic. …

And the fact that he is in real estate, and that Jered Kushner is in real estate. In fact, Jared Kushner bought the property at 666 5th Ave. It was the biggest real estate deal in history: $1.5 billion. …

If you look at the Israeli flag, in between the two blue lines, which represent the Nile and the Euphrates Rivers, which is what the greater Israel is supposed to be; it’s what they want to rule from: the Euphrates to the Nile — is 666, a 6 pointed Satanic star with 6 points, 6 triangles and a 6 sided hexagon in there.

So you have to wonder if Kushner and Trump aren’t a part of this plan to rebuild the temple, part of this Luciferian plan, perhaps using their expertise and background in building things.”

James mentions these two videos:

(video) Trump’s Jewish Elite MAFIA and the 5 Dancing Israelis (2017)

(video) Nathanael: Trump’s Deck Of Jewish Cards

• • •

Donald Trump the 21st Century Super-Zionist! with James Perloff

(audio) James Perloff: “The Christian community doesn’t know it’s been taken over by the Rothschilds who created Israel. They’re taught that Israel is our friend, allies of the Christians, which they do not view themselves as” | On Trump & Jerusalem: “If you read the prophecies in the Bible, it’s not a temple for Christ, as so many dispensational Christians believe. It’s going to be a temple for the antichrist, a temple for the leader of this whole NWO • He’s getting together a cabinet that doesn’t look CFR to me. It looks Zionist. He’s surrounded by Zionists • It looks like a war cabinet” | 1st guest on the Shadow Citizen 1/25/17

From: jamesperloff.com

January 25. I had lots of fun with Rob Ossell and Rachael McIntosh as the first guest on their brand-new show Shadow Citizen. Topics included: my past, the Council on Foreign Relations, Israel, monarchies, Freemasonry, and Donald Trump’s positives vs. his Zionist connections.

• • •

James Perloff on Christians & Israel @ 9:53:

“Part of the problem with 9/11, in communicating to Christians is that the Christian community doesn’t know that it has really been taken over — and I’m talking about the fundamentalist side of the protestant churches — they have been taken over through the back door by the Rothschilds, through front groups, through a front reference Bible called the Scofield Reference Bible, which goes back a century now. They’ve been taught that Israel is the modern recreation of Biblical Israel. It is not. It is a creation of the Rothschilds. The Balfour declaration, which was used to blackmail Britain into creating….

The Rothschilds bought up all kinds of land in Palestine. The Rothschilds built the Israeli supreme court…. It’s got a Masonic pyramid on the top, and it’s got the Rothschilds’ portraits on the inside. It would be fair to say that Israel is their proxy state.

They are the main force behind 9/11. So when you talk 9/11, and you talk about Israel, a lot of Christians are going to be taken aback, because they’ve been taught that Israel is our friend, that they are the allies of the Christians, which they do not view themselves as.”

Poll: American Jews Rate Evangelicals as Low as Muslims

“(HD Video 2015) Solving 9/11 Christopher Bollyn Live in Dallas TX Feb 12, 2015 — Israeli hardline Zionists named • Powerful Powerpoint presentation!

(video) “Zionism and Christianity: Unholy Alliance” – real-history, full-length film by Ted Pike — “They [pastors] were supposed to be WATCHMEN on the wall, yet they failed to utter even a hint of warning”

(video) Roots of Christian Zionism: How Scofield Sowed Seeds of Apostasy — The ‘ANGRY’ Evangelicals – Praying for War instead of “Blessed are the Peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God” – Jesus

James Perloff on Donald Trump @ 45:55:

“I’m concerned about the fact that he says he’s going to move that U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. If you look into the history of Zionism, and the desire to rebuild and tear down the mosque at the temple mount, and build a new Jewish temple there, which if you read the Bible and you read the prophecies there, it’s not a temple for Christ as so many dispensational Christians believe. It’s going to be a temple for the antichrist, a temple for the leader of this whole New World Order. And that, when you put it together, is a very frightening aspect to Donald Trump. …

He’s getting together a cabinet. It doesn’t look CFR to me. It looks Zionist. He’s surrounded by Zionists. … It looks like a war cabinet…he’s assembling.”

Transcribed by Jeff Fenske

• • •

01 25 2017 James Perloff

Mentioned by James:

(video) “The Brotherhood of the Bell” (1970) – The Original Skull & Bones Movie – full length

Most modern NT ‘Bibles’ are based on an Egyptian text rejected by Christendom 1500 years ago — that removed the second half of Romans 8:1 – “Now there is NO CONDEMNATION to them which are IN CHRIST JESUS, ***WHO don’t WALK according to the flesh, but ACCORDING TO THE SPIRIT***”

PROFOUNDLY IMPORTANT!

Heresies, like once-saved-always-saved, are perpetuated by these truth gutted translations. For example:

Look what the NIV did to Romans 8:1 — They changed the entire meaning of the verse and leave no requirement or prerequisite to being free from condemnation! [Grace changing teachers now make Romans 8:1A their OSAS theme song, while verses 4-17 still say we must walk according to the Spirit, suffering with Christ to be heirs & children of God having ‘no condemnation’]

– –

The problem:
The new translations of the Bible have “corrected” the older versions and we find many of our beliefs a little harder to defend. What has happened? They say they have found more reliable, and older manuscripts.

The Faithful Witness, From Amazing Facts [In brackets and indented, I add more of the original, footnoted article – editor]

The case of those “older” Biblical manuscripts. …

There is now a general concept that newer translations are more reliable because they are translated from “older” Biblical manuscripts than the KJV. This argument has been used in discrediting the second half of the verse in Romans 8:1 where it says “Now there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”

Let’s look at these “older” manuscripts of NT writings in more detail. For the past hundred years there has been a rivalry between two Greek texts: the Received Text and the Critical Text. …

The critical Text has only come into wide circulation in the last hundred years, as evidenced by the large number of Bible versions translated from it. It is largely influenced by the Alexandrian line of manuscripts. Out of over 5000 Greek manuscripts in existence, only a small handful – less than ten — contain this text-type. However prominent among these few are two manuscripts which many scholars value more highly than most other manuscripts. They are called Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, and they date a little over 200 years from the original writings.

Sinaiticus was discovered in 1844 by Constantine Tischendorf while visiting a monastery at the base of Mt. Sinai. He found 43 leaves of it in a basket waiting to be burned. Several years later he acquired the remainder of the leaves from the monastery, and by 1862 he had published the complete manuscript.

Vaticanus’ history is not as dramatic as Sinaiticus. . Pope Nicholas V brought it to the Vatican in 1448. For hundreds of years, the Roman Catholic Church guarded it so closely that no Protestant scholar of ability was allowed to study it for any length of time. In 1866 however, the Vatican finally allowed Constantine Tischendorf, under supervision, to copy the manuscript. In 1867 he published it.

Both these manuscripts are older than the Received Text from which the KJV was translated. Does this mean we now have a more authentic base for our modern Biblical translations?

These older manuscripts contain significantly different readings than those of the Received Test. The Alexandrian Test had been out of circulation for 1500 years. If it is the true version why would God allow His church to be deprived of the truth for so long? In addition the benefits of the Alexandrian Text to the church have been dubious indeed.

This text type has trouble meeting scholarly standards for accuracy of transcription. Minor differences within text types are normal; however, the number of variants within the Alexandrian Text is enormous. Not including minor errors such as spelling, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus disagree with each other over 3000 time[s] in the space of the four Gospels alone. This means that one or the other must be wrong 3000 times. That averages to a disagreement on almost every verse of the Gospels! It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two manuscripts differ the one from the other , than two consecutive verses, in which they agree.

Undoubtedly these manuscripts suffer from scribal carelessness. Vaticanus exhibits numerous places where the scribe has written the same word or phrase twice in succession, a clear indication that the writing was not checked. The scribe of Sinaiticus occasionally skipped lines in copying and made so many obvious errors that during the time Sinaiticus was used, ten different readers noted corrections. However, instead of questioning the reliability of these manuscripts, scholars have accepted many of their peculiar readings. Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are the basis for most of the two hundred omissions from the modern New Testament versions.

For several years the Alexandrian Text was blindly accepted. But recent scholarship has confirmed that what has been restored should not be considered the original text, simply the text that had the highest authority in Alexandria, Egypt in the third century.

Alexandria, Egypt, an area to which none of the original manuscripts were addressed, has little claim upon our confidence as possessing a pure text. A look into the history of Alexandria, especially during the time these manuscripts are believed to have been produced, is quite revealing.

[Alexandria, a great center of commerce and Helenistic culture, was renowned for its schools of philosophy. Philosophical teachings permeated the community—including the Christian church. Christian “thinkers” regarded Greek philosophy as a tool for understanding and applying Scripture, and like the pagans around them, they started a school which became the main focus and stimulus of their intellectual and spiritual life. The leaders of the school were usually experts in Greek philosophy, and they greatly influenced the theology of the Christians in Alexandria. (source)]

One of the most notable leaders of this school was Origen. Origen studied deeply into Platonism and Stoicism, seeking to harmonize their philosophic principles with the Scriptures. To do so, he allegorized the Scriptures—a process that allowed him to interpret them any way he wished. Further, he questioned the authenticity of certain portions of Scripture that did not conform to his own idiosyncratic beliefs. His teachings not only promoted a critical attitude toward the Scriptures, but they helped breed numerous heresies in Alexandria, including the doctrine of Arianism. … The Arian controversy centered around the nature of Christ. The Arians taught that Christ was a created being….

[Constantine, the great mixer of paganism and Christianity, was emperor when the controversy began in A.D. 320. (source)]

Several scholars believe that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus were produced when Constantine ordered 50 Bibles to be prepared in AD 331. Vaticanus and Sinaiticus were both written on parchments of vellum by talented calligraphers, a very expensive specification included in Constantine’s order. …

[Constantine called upon Eusebius of Caesarea to be in charge of the preparation of the Bibles. Eusebius is well known as an enthusiastic admirer of Origen, and was inclined to favor the Arians. If such a one was in charge of preparing these manuscripts, it is no wonder the Critical Text—and consequently nearly every modern version—lacks fervent support for the deity of Christ. If Eusebius used any of the critical skills of his mentor, he was likely to dissect the Scriptures, thinking he was correcting them. This may explain some of the omissions characteristic of the Alexandrian Text and likewise of most modern versions. …

Whether through Eusebius, other misguided critics, or one of the countless heretics that Alexandria bred, 30 it is apparent that the Alexandrians’ attempt to “correct” the Scriptures failed. Within 200 years this text-type fell into discredit and disuse. 31 (source)]

It is also historically told us that the manuscripts ordered by Constantine were written in extreme haste. Repeatedly, Constantine urged Eusebius to press the project with all speed. Careful proof reading and correcting would be time consuming. …

[It is interesting to realize that several of the omissions and peculiar readings of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus were once found only in Roman Catholic Bibles. Dr. Benjamin G. Wilkinson, history professor and late president of Washington Missionary College, has proposed that Jerome, a great admirer of both Origen and Eusebius, transmitted many Eusebio-Origen errors into the Latin Vulgate. 32 The Latin Vulgate has been the recognized Bible of Catholics for centuries. The English Rheims-Douay version is translated from it. History is replete with episodes of violence wrought by the Catholic Church against all who did not receive the Latin Vulgate. To deny their Scriptures was to deny the Church’s self-appointed authority. When the modern versions began to appear with several readings previously propagated only in Catholic Bibles, Thomas S. Preston of St. Ann’s Church of New York was recorded in Dr. Warfields’ Collection of Opinions and Reviews as saying, “It is to us a gratification to find that in very many instances they have adopted the reading of the Catholic Version, and have thus by their scholarship confirmed the correctness of our [Catholic] Bible.” 33

In summary, we find that the Critical Text hardly fits the biblical description of the Sacred Text. It is based on a text-type that lay idle for 1,500 years except for some renderings retained within the Catholic Church. In addition, the text reflects the Arian views prominent in the fourth century in Alexandria, and it contains numerous omissions likely due to misguided editing and careless copying. (source)]

Now let’s examine where the Received Text comes from — the text upon which the KJV is based. Unlike the small number of manuscripts that support the Alexandrian Text, the Received Text is derived from the Byzantine text-type which is represented in 80 to 90 percent of all Greek manuscripts. That amounts to approximately 4000 witnesses! These representations of this text come from many different places — Greece, Constantinople, Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria, Alexandria, Africa, Italy, England, Ireland. This is quite a contrast to the limited locality and time range of the Alexandrian Text.

[Although none of the Greek manuscripts of the Byzantine text-type date before A.D. 400, most scholars agree that in order for this text-type to be so widespread and predominant among the Greek manuscripts, it had to have a much earlier existence. 36 Indeed, distinctive Byzantine readings are found in all of the oldest versions, 37 in the papyri, 38 and in the Scriptural quotations of the early church fathers. 39 In numerous places the Byzantine text-type can be shown to be as early or earlier than any text-type. 40 It was the authoritative Scriptures of the Syrian church, the Waldensian church of northern Italy, and the Greek Orthodox Church. Wilkinson’s study also suggests the Byzantine text-type was the Scriptures of such early churches as the Celtic church in Scotland and Ireland, and the Gallic church in southern France. 41 (source)]
Continue reading “Most modern NT ‘Bibles’ are based on an Egyptian text rejected by Christendom 1500 years ago — that removed the second half of Romans 8:1 – “Now there is NO CONDEMNATION to them which are IN CHRIST JESUS, ***WHO don’t WALK according to the flesh, but ACCORDING TO THE SPIRIT***””

(video) “When God Comes” – ASBURY COLLEGE REVIVAL 1970 — RECONCILIATION/CONFESSION — “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you!”

Reconciliation/getting right with all examples:

9:20 “I’ve been over there all day and He is working. You think it’s hard for you to come down here. You get a senior in seminary to go to the altar and confess things that could have him kicked out of seminary.”

21:30 Overcoming lust — publicly acknowledging — coming clean!!!

• • •

Asbury College Revival 1970 (FULL)

Related:

(video) Asbury Revival, 1970: RECONCILIATION the KEY! — “‘Dr. Kinlaw, I am a liar. Now what do I do?’ … Three days later, she came to me radiant, and she said, ‘I just hit my 34th person and I’M FREE!’”

My 1990 Key-to-Revival Prophecy: “There is MIGHT and there is POWER and there is GLORY, but it is being withheld until these relationships are made right, until we love our brother enough to…”

The Welsh Revival of 1904-05 by J. Edwin Orr: A Countrywide Asbury-like REVIVAL! The 4 Points: #1 Confess any known sin, and put any wrong done to man right again. #2 Put away any doubtful habit. #3 Obey the Spirit promptly. #4 Confess your faith publicly.

Effects of the WELSH REVIVAL 1904-05: Whole communities were radically changed FROM DEPRAVITY TO GLORIOUS GOODNESS. The CRIME RATE dropped, often to nothing. THE POLICE had little more to do than supervise the coming and going of the people to the chapel prayer meetings. THE UNDERGROUND MINES echoed with the sounds of PRAYER and HYMNS, instead of nasty jokes and gossip. People who had fallen out BECAME FRIENDS AGAIN!!!!!!!

Rick Joyner: “REPENTANCE includes RESTITUTION for the wrongs that have caused injury to others”

What Does God Say About Lying PRESStitutes, Politicians & Pastors: “ALL LIARS, their part is in the lake that burns with fire”

Why Leaders Won’t Repent: “I was HURTING INSIDE, but I was much TOO PROUD TO SHOW IT.” “A leader has to have been broken in order to get himself out of the way and realize that he’s not really in the control he thinks he is.” “My gods were ‘get ahead,’ ‘get power.’ I really enjoyed it. I loved being saluted” – Chuck Colson

The Achan Factor — Because of one man’s disobedience the entire nation of Israel had to deal with the “Achan factor” among them before they could come under the umbrella of Almighty God’s blessings once again!

‘Let Us Be ONE’ Prophecy Continues 10/8/08: “It’s TOO LATE to REVERSE what’s been done for MY MEN have been REJECTED … Now is the Time to OVERCOME and GET RIGHT With ALL … FREEeeeeeeeeeeeee———DOM at last … Your HEART will SWELL with LOVE and it will be EASY to REMAIN In Me when others are On The BOAT With You”

(video) The Azusa Street Revival (1906-15): The biggest move of miracles in the history of America — The fire of God’s glory on the roof! “Even the fingernails grew back!” In 1909, Seymour prophesied the next, even greater revival will come in about 100 years! We’re due!!!

 

Charisma Editor: An Asbury-like Spiritual Awakening is the “Only Thing That Will Save Us”

The Didache (70-100 AD): Reconciliation was required to attend early church meetings! “How upside-down the ‘church’ is today.”

Can ‘Christians’ use Paul’s “Forgetting the things which are behind…I press on” statement as an excuse to not get right with those they’ve hurt? Paul also said: “I also practice ALWAYS having a conscience void of offense toward God and men.” What if you don’t repent? And what will happen when you do? The Third Great Awakening can start with us!!! We can all be happy — ‘ONE’!

My Dream of ‘ONE’ Happening at Abbott Loop CC!

Paul’s Elders’ qualifications revisited: What does ‘BLAMELESS’ mean? — Most pastors are biblically disqualified

Wes Hall [IHOP] on William Seymour’s 1909 prophecy of the shekinah glory returning to the church in 100 years: “Let me tell you about the church in the book of Acts. …the fear of God was on the community, and no one dared join them. But they were highly esteemed. Why did no one dare join them?”

Wes Hall to church leaders: “There’s a cry in your heart saying ‘I am not prepared to walk forward another step in dead works and dead religion”

Who-Goes-To-Heaven Scriptures — Narrow is the Way | Who are the Children of God? — “There is therefore now *no condemnation* to those who are IN CHRIST Jesus, who don’t WALK according to the flesh, but ACCORDING TO THE SPIRIT.”

 

If we build it He will come:
“Let Us Be ONE” (A Prophecy)

(video) Hidden Faith of The Founding Fathers — “Nearly All Infidels” — David Barton Debunked

My Notes:

27:15 Thomas Paine etc., The Illuminate

37:30 “If the pen of Paine was the spirit behind the war of independence, what spirit was it?”

41 Thomas Jefferson had no great love for Christianity or the Bible

54:30 Benjamin Franklin

1:12:40 John Adams

1:23: Part of this quote is stated

The Reverend Bird Wilson, who was just a few years removed from being a contemporary of the so-called founding fathers, said further in the above-mentioned sermon that “the founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected [George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson] _not a one had professed a belief in Christianity_” (Remsberg, p. 120, emphasis added).

Dr. Wilson’s sermon, which was published in the Albany Daily Advertiser the month it was delivered also made an interesting observation that flatly contradicts the frantic efforts of present-day fundamentalists to make the “founding fathers” orthodox Christians

When the war was over and the victory over our enemies won, and the blessings and happiness of liberty and peace were secured, the Constitution was framed and God was neglected. He was not merely forgotten. He was absolutely voted out of the Constitution. The proceedings, as published by Thompson, the secretary, and the history of the day, show that the question was gravely debated whether God should be in the Constitution or not, and after a solemn debate he was deliberately voted out of it…. There is not only in the theory of our government no recognition of God’s laws and sovereignty, but its practical operation, its administration, has been conformable to its theory. Those who have been called to administer the government have not been men making any public profession of Christianity…. Washington was a man of valor and wisdom. He was esteemed by the whole world as a great and good man; but he was not a professing Christian (quoted by Remsberg, pp. 120-121, emphasis added). (source)

1:24:50 George Washington

1:41:15 Washington had trouble with the ‘only believe,’ easy road to heaven idea

1:52:30 Jesuits

2:12: David Barton debunked

2:28:00 David Barton’s early-Freemasonry theory debunked

• • •

The Hidden Faith of The Founding Fathers 2010

Related:

(video) James Perloff: Who Fired the Shots Heard Round the World? – REVOLUTIONARY WAR a FREEMASONRY FALSE FLAG • There were NO ONEROUS TAXES laid on Americans, nor other legitimate reasons to revolt • The BREWERS of revolution: SAMUEL ADAMS was a Dick Cheny-like warmonger; Paul Revere’s role; HIDDEN GUNMEN fired the first shots; THOMAS *PAYNE* (an atheist) wrote the Declaration of Independence • The 50 year PLEDGE TO SECRECY